#BEST WAY TO ANALZE DATA IN POKERTRACKER PROFESSIONAL#

The underlying mechanisms and their interactions, however, are still not well understood (Gobet & Schiller, 2011).Īn approach to the construction of classifiers from imbalanced datasets isĭescribed.

Integrated models of problem gambling, such as the pathways model of Blaszczynski and Nower (2002), attempt to (re-)establish a holistic view in a research field that resorts to increasingly specific and intricate research designs.

#BEST WAY TO ANALZE DATA IN POKERTRACKER PROFESSIONAL#

Individual factors are thought to interact with the gambling environment and the larger social, professional and familial environment, adding to the complexity. Myrseth et al., 2010), mechanisms underlying mood regulation (Brown et al., 2004) and coping styles (e.g. McCusker & Gettings, 1997), decision-making (e.g. Brevers et al., 2011), implicit memory (e.g. Linnet et al., 2010a), cognitive processes of attention (e.g. A wealth of factors are implied in the development and maintenance of problem gambling, including biological mechanisms of rewardprocessing (e.g. Taking into consideration only the variables overlapping between PGSI and SOGS, we found some key predictive factors for a more risky and harmful online poker playing: a lower performance in the emotional intelligence competences (Emotional Quotient inventory Short) and, in particular, those grouped in the Intrapersonal scale (emotional self-awareness, assertiveness, self-regard, independence and self-actualization).Ĭurrent research paints the picture of problem gambling as a multifaceted phenomenon, for which there is not one single explanation. The highest correlations between EF test results and poker ability and between EF test results and gambling quality assessment showed that mostly different clusters of executive functions characterize the profile of the strong(er) poker player and those ones of the problem gamblers (PGSI and SOGS) and the one of the cognitions related to gambling (GRCS). Data analysis determined which variables of the tests correlated with poker ability and gambling quality scores. Three poker experts evaluated anonymized poker hand history files and, then, a trained professional administered an extensive neuropsychological test battery. Furthermore, it assessed if the EF performance was correlated to the quality of gambling, according to self-reported questionnaires (PGSI, SOGS, GRCS). This study investigated if online poker players of different ability showed different performances in their EF and if so, which functions were the most discriminating for their playing ability. Poker playing and responsible gambling both entail the use of the executive functions (EF), which are higher-level cognitive abilities.

Best way to analze data in pokertracker